Reducing the Tax Shield of Debt

As I wrote last week, there is broad bipartisan agreement that Congress must reduce the statutory tax rate on C corporations. However, politicians won’t find easy answers when it comes to paying for meaningful rate reduction. Ending subsidies to oil and gas companies or repealing the accelerated depreciation for corporate jets won’t make a real dent in the budget. Meanwhile, the largest tax expenditures in the corporate tax code effectively encourage capital investment, or Research & Development, just to name a few. Many of these breaks serve a reasonable economic purpose, and sizeable constituencies will fight their repeal.

Continue reading

Paying for Corporate Tax Reform

According to yesterday’s FT, corporate tax reform in the United States has been put on the back burner. But that hasn’t stopped experts from proposing new options for reforming the broken code. Recently, my colleagues at Brookings released “A Dozen Economic Facts about Tax Reform,” (pdf) which included several illustrative options for corporate tax reform. And yesterday, Laura Tyson, the head of the Council of Economic Advisers for former President Clinton, outlined her proposal for a revenue-neutral reduction in the corporate tax rate.

Continue reading

The danger of rolling back investor protections

Right about now, the Senate is scheduled to vote on H.R. 3606, the “JumpStart Our Business Start-ups Act” (or “JOBS Act”), which passed the House 390 to 23. The bill would roll back investor protections for a wide swath of mid-sized companies. Last week, Harvard Law School’s John Coates and I wrote an Op-Ed for the Washington Post arguing that the reforms would go too far.

Continue reading

Smoothing Corporate Pension Plan Discount Rates

There’s a controversial cost-offset provision in the highway bill currently being debated in the Senate; it would effectively allow corporations to make smaller contributions to their pension plans. And since a smaller contribution means a smaller tax write-off, tax revenue would increase by $7 billion over ten years. Although the bill itself is certainly not headed for an easy passage, this provision has raised some interesting—and complex—issues related to pension accounting.

Continue reading